Research Article - (2021) Volume 11, Issue 2
Influence of chelates on pigs productivity and quality
O. Kuzmenko1*, V. Bomko1, А. Horchanok2, O. Cherniavskyi1, V. Malina1, L. Lytvyshchenko2, R. Umanets3, L. Zlamaniuk3, D. Umanets3 and I. Porotikova2Abstract
Feeding Zinc in the form of an organic chelate in the mixed feed for young Large White pigs in fattening causes improved metabolic processes in the organism, which positively affects the indices of pigs' laughter. The intervention of zinc chelate in mixed feed promotes an increase in the morphological composition of the carcass and an improvement in the chemical composition of meat and lard. It was established that in the process of fattening young Large White pigs with a zinc chelate dose of 83.2 g/t in mixed feed, a slaughter yield is higher by 1.2% compared with analogs of control. Pigs exceeded analogs by 6.6% in meat yield and by 0.9% in protein content in meat.
https://www.mobafire.com/profile/marmaristeknekirala12-1120487?profilepage http://www.effecthub.com/user/3725743 http://hawkee.com/profile/4949273/ https://www.youmagine.com/marmaristeknekirala12/designs https://www.myminifactory.com/users/Marmaristeknekirala12 http://onlineboxing.net/jforum/user/editDone/250019.page http://qooh.me/Marmaristekne https://linktr.ee/marmaristeknekirala12 https://pubhtml5.com/homepage/rskea/ https://telegra.ph/Marmaristeknekirala12-09-05 https://www.diggerslist.com/64f721ff718d5/about https://allmyfaves.com/Marmaristeknekirala12 https://www.metal-archives.com/users/Marmaristeknekirala12 https://www.catchafire.org/profiles/2490257/ https://www.fimfiction.net/user/633629/Marmaristeknekirala12 https://www.hebergementweb.org/members/marmaristeknekirala12.548722/ https://www.sqlservercentral.com/forums/user/marmaristeknekirala12 https://www.twitch.tv/marmaristeknekirala12/about https://www.roleplaygateway.com/member/Marmaristeknekirala12/ https://ko-fi.com/marmaristeknekirala12#paypalModal https://www.provenexpert.com/marmaristeknekirala12/ https://www.intensedebate.com/people/marmaristekne https://www.indiegogo.com/individuals/35150686 https://visual.ly/users/marmaristeknekirala/portfolio https://slides.com/marmaristeknekirala12 https://letterboxd.com/marmaristekne/ https://micro.blog/Marmaristeknekirala https://fliphtml5.com/dashboard/public-profile/pudlf https://community.windy.com/user/marmaristekne https://speakerdeck.com/marmaristeknekirala12 https://trello.com/u/marmaristeknekirala/activity https://www.redbubble.com/people/Marmaristekne/shop?asc=u https://myanimelist.net/profile/Marmaristekne https://3dwarehouse.sketchup.com/user/12639f7f-92aa-411b-a067-e7deea565fbf/Marmaristeknekirala12-M https://www.wattpad.com/user/Marmaristekne https://www.goodreads.com/user/show/169647299-marmaristeknekirala12 https://sourceforge.net/u/marmaristekne/profile https://tr.gravatar.com/marmaristeknekirala https://tr.pinterest.com/marmaristeknekirala/ https://www.mapleprimes.com/users/Marmaristeknekirala12 https://medium.com/@marmaristeknekirala https://www.ted.com/profiles/44959924 https://www.infragistics.com/community/members/d358780bec8a5f20d6f4563b7fd9e569ff4f3a39?_ga=2.74596625.2087551855.1693994141-821832157.1693994141 https://www.metooo.io/u/64f84eca6d5e6b4d2dc9d465 https://app.roll20.net/users/12383781/marmaristeknekirala12-m https://list.ly/marmaristeknekirala/newsfeed https://giphy.com/channel/Marmaristeknekirala12 https://www.tumblr.com/marmaristeknekirala12 https://dzone.com/users/4989214/marmaristeknekirala12.html https://www.creativelive.com/student/marmaristeknekirala12-marmaristeknekirala12?via=accounts-freeform_2 https://gab.com/Marmaristeknekirala12 https://sketchfab.com/Marmaristeknekirala12 https://www.flickr.com/people/httpsmarmaristeknekiralacomtr/ https://hub.docker.com/u/marmaristeknekirala12 https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user/self https://mastodon.online/@Marmaristeknekirala12 https://wefunder.com/marmaristeknekirala12 https://calis.delfi.lv/profils/ https://os.mbed.com/users/marmaristeknekirala1/ https://notionpress.com/author/921940# https://guides.co/a/marmaristeknekirala12-marmaristeknekirala12/ https://www.bahamaslocal.com/userprofile/1/239817/Marmaristeknekirala12.html http://molbiol.ru/forums/index.php?showuser=1296710 https://www.credly.com/users/marmaristeknekirala12-marmaristeknekirala12/badges https://www.facer.io/user/irCYaMEYX0 https://www.mobafire.com/profile/marmarishome12-1119055?profilepage https://www.wishlistr.com/profile/ http://www.effecthub.com/user/3724210 http://hawkee.com/profile/4884005/ https://www.youmagine.com/marmarishome/designs https://www.myminifactory.com/users/marmarishome12 http://onlineboxing.net/jforum/user/edit/248549.page http://qooh.me/account/home/ https://band.us/band/92152039 https://linktr.ee/marmarishome12 https://pubhtml5.com/homepage/iprhm/ https://telegra.ph/marmarishome12-08-24 https://www.diggerslist.com/64e719eb6d769/about https://www.facer.io/user/WJmAjPpNr9 https://allmyfaves.com/marmarishome12 https://www.metal-archives.com/users/marmarishome12 https://www.catchafire.org/profiles/2479894/ https://www.fimfiction.net/user/630254/marmarishome12 https://www.hebergementweb.org/members/marmarishome12.542713/ https://www.sqlservercentral.com/forums/user/marmarishome12 https://www.twitch.tv/marmarishome12/about https://www.roleplaygateway.com/member/marmarishome12/ https://ko-fi.com/marmarishome12 https://www.provenexpert.com/marmarishome12/ https://www.intensedebate.com/people/marmarishome12 https://www.indiegogo.com/individuals/35056645 https://visual.ly/users/marmarishome/portfolio https://slides.com/marmarishome12 https://letterboxd.com/marmarishome12/ https://micro.blog/marmarishome12 https://fliphtml5.com/dashboard/publications https://community.windy.com/user/marmarishome12 https://www.longisland.com/profile/marmarishome12 https://speakerdeck.com/marmarishome12 https://trello.com/u/marmarishome/activity https://www.redbubble.com/people/marmarishome12 https://disqus.com/by/marmarishome12/about/ https://myanimelist.net/profile/marmarishome12 https://3dwarehouse.sketchup.com/user/c6ed99ef-400c-4a3d-af93-11bfcb2be913/marmarishome12-M https://www.wattpad.com/user/marmarishome12 https://www.goodreads.com/user/show/169358554-marmarishome12 https://sourceforge.net/u/marmarishome12/profile https://en.gravatar.com/marmarishomee4e8b75111 https://tr.pinterest.com/marmarishome/ https://www.mapleprimes.com/users/marmarishome12 https://medium.com/@marmarishome https://www.ted.com/profiles/44878861 https://www.infragistics.com/community/members/5d36dfb4d9fe1a193a81f1559de3c43d20e17704 https://marmarishome12.livejournal.com/profile https://www.metooo.io/u/64ec674f6d5e6b4d2dc02b90 https://hubpages.com/@marmarishome12 https://app.roll20.net/users/12349873/marmarishome12-m https://list.ly/marmarishome/ https://giphy.com/channel/marmarishome12 https://www.tumblr.com/blog/marmarishome https://dzone.com/users/4984261/marmarishome12.html https://www.creativelive.com/student/marmarishome12-marmarishome12?via=accounts-freeform_2 https://gab.com/marmarishome12 https://sketchfab.com/marmarishome12 https://www.flickr.com/people/199033566@N03/ https://devpost.com/marmarishome https://hub.docker.com/u/marmarishome12 https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user/self https://profiles.wordpress.org/marmarishome12/ https://mastodon.online/@marmarishome12 https://wefunder.com/marmarishome https://seedandspark.com/user/marmarishome12 https://calis.delfi.lv/profils/lietotajs/311777-marmarishome12/ https://os.mbed.com/users/marmarishome12/ https://notionpress.com/author/918713# https://my.desktopnexus.com/marmarishome12/#ProfileComments https://guides.co/a/marmarishome12-marmarishome12/ https://www.bahamaslocal.com/userprofile/1/237330/marmarishome12.html http://molbiol.ru/forums/index.php?showuser=1295383 https://www.credly.com/users/marmarishome12-marmarishome12/badges https://orcid.org/0009-0009-4483-3745 https://www.mobafire.com/profile/marmarisboatcharter12-1124453?profilepage https://www.youmagine.com/marmarisboatcharter12/designs https://www.myminifactory.com/users/Marmarisboatcharter12 http://qooh.me/MarmarisSS https://linktr.ee/marmarisboatcharter12 https://pubhtml5.com/homepage/pdrml/ https://telegra.ph/Marmarisboatcharter12-10-06 https://www.diggerslist.com/651fbb00ae0f3/about https://allmyfaves.com/Marmarisboatcharter12 https://www.metal-archives.com/users/Marmarisboatcharter12 https://www.catchafire.org/profiles/2517163/ https://www.fimfiction.net/user/643467/Marmarisboatcharter12 https://www.hebergementweb.org/members/marmarisboatcharter12.562475/ https://www.sqlservercentral.com/forums/user/marmarisboatcharter12 https://www.twitch.tv/marmarisboatcharter12/about https://www.roleplaygateway.com/member/Marmarisboatcharter12/ https://www.provenexpert.com/marmarisboatcharter12/?mode=preview https://www.intensedebate.com/people/Marmarisboat https://www.indiegogo.com/individuals/35445398 https://visual.ly/users/marmarisboatcharter/portfolio https://slides.com/marmarisboatcharter12 https://letterboxd.com/marmarisboatcha/ https://fliphtml5.com/dashboard/public-profile/sfskb https://community.windy.com/user/marmarisboat https://speakerdeck.com/marmarisboatcharter12 https://trello.com/u/marmarisboatcharter https://myanimelist.net/profile/Besthairtranss https://3dwarehouse.sketchup.com/user/5acb3c60-4aca-43fd-91da-6bd442fd2ca0/Marmarisboatcharter12-M https://www.wattpad.com/user/Marmarisboat https://www.goodreads.com/user/show/170488799-marmarisboatcharter12 https://gravatar.com/marmarisboatcharterc48f3b5147 https://tr.pinterest.com/besthairtransplant12/ https://www.mapleprimes.com/users/Marmarisboatcharter12 https://medium.com/@marmarisboatcharter https://www.ted.com/profiles/45229026 https://www.infragistics.com/community/members/478be3bd644f2f8748f42767e5de46f150b1c783?_ga=2.233792990.1346871303.1696583692-28579674.1696583692 https://www.metooo.io/u/651fd08c119b751a01cd570d https://app.roll20.net/users/12503055/marmarisboatcharter12-m https://list.ly/marmarisboatcharter/activity https://giphy.com/channel/Marmarisboatcharter12 https://www.tumblr.com/marmarisboatcharter12 https://www.creativelive.com/student/marmarisboatcharter12?via=accounts-freeform_2 https://gab.com/Marmarisboatcharter12 https://www.flickr.com/people/199297576@N06/ https://seedandspark.com/user/marmarisboatcharter12-01hc2f7yr1a08wjenetgcj2pw4 https://os.mbed.com/users/marmarisboatcharter1/ https://calis.delfi.lv/blogs/lietotajs/317879-marmarisboatcharter12/ https://notionpress.com/author/933488 https://my.desktopnexus.com/Marmarisboatcharter12/ https://guides.co/a/marmarisboatcharter12-marmarisboatcharter12/ https://www.bahamaslocal.com/userprofile/1/249936/Marmarisboatcharter12.html http://molbiol.ru/forums/index.php?showuser=1302210 https://www.credly.com/users/marmarisboatcharter12-marmarisboatcharter12/badges https://ko-fi.com/marmarisboatcharter12#paypalModal https://devpost.com/marmarisboatcharter?ref_content=user-portfolio&ref_feature=portfolio&ref_medium=global-nav https://www.redbubble.com/people/Marmarisboat/shop?asc=u https://hub.docker.com/u/marmarisboatcharter12 http://onlineboxing.net/jforum/user/editDone/254192.page https://micro.blog/Marmarisboat http://www.effecthub.com/user/3729468 http://hawkee.com/profile/5136037/ https://wefunder.com/marmarisboatcharter12 https://www.facer.io/user/4s2M4eDMJM https://mastodon.online/@Marmarisboatcharter12 https://sketchfab.com/Marmarisboatcharter12 https://profiles.wordpress.org/marmarisboatcharter12/ https://dzone.com/users/5002505/marmarisboatcharter12.html
Keywords
Pigs, Zinc chelate, Mixed feed, Slaughter weight, Slaughter yield, Morphological composition of carcasses, Chemical composition of meat, Lard, Internal organs
Introduction
Ukraine has sufficient genetic potential of pig breeds which can be effectively used in the hybridization system to produce young animals for fattening. With sufficient and balanced feeding, the nutrient transformation level from mixed feed into the substance of product during fattening maybe 45-50%. The primary method of reaching the transformation is to organize a balanced feeding that means the use of diets that suit them best to the needs of animals in containing the essential nutrients and biologically active substances (Mavromichalis et al., 2001; Wang et al., 2013; Smetanina et al., 2017).
Previous studies have found that among the substances that play an essential role in the vital activity of the animal organism, recently, great attention has been paid to microelements, i.e., chemical elements contained in the body in deficient concentrations. Most microelements are indispensable for the organism. The lack or excess of them can cause significant pathological changes in the animal organism (Borisevich et al., 2008; Pal et al., 2010). Zinc is also an essential microelement. Zinc is required for the functioning of more than one hundred enzymes, such as carboxypeptidase, oxidoreductase, transferase, alcohol dehydrogenase, which are related to protein and carbohydrate metabolism, energy metabolism, nucleic acid synthesis, haem biosynthesis, CO2 transport, and others (El Ashry et al., 2012).
The issue of mineral supplements development in the diets of animals aimed for reducing the level of heavy metals and their excretion into the environment and increasing their digestion is worked out by several scientists (Hackbartet al., 2010; Dyachenko et al., 2017), they offer the use of organic microelements, especially the chelate compounds of microelements and amino acids. Therefore, most studies are currently focused on examining the effects of metal chelates on animal productivity (Saripinar Aksu et al., 2010; El Ashry et al., 2012; Kuzmenko O. et al., 2020). Presently carbonate, chloride, and sulfate of zinc, which have good water solubility, are an effective source of enrichment for diets. Therefore, these elements are rapidly excreted and have little absorption (Sethy et al., 2012; Bomko et al., 2015).
Previous studies have proved that with sulfates introducing into premixes, the crystalline water contained in their molecules can be released during storage under the influence of various factors, which results in the intensification of the destruction of both vitamins and microelements. Therefore, sulfates are more dangerous for the stability of vitamins than other compounds.
Scientists say that the Zinc effect on the animal body is multifaceted, and the optimization of diets with this microelement affects the normalization of various metabolic processes (Nagalakshmi et al., 2018; Horchanok A.V. et al., 2019).
The purpose of the research was to set the optimum dose of zinc chelate in mixed feed for young Large White pigs in the process of fattening, which can provide maximum meat productivity.
Materials and Methods
The doses of the drug did not influence the composition and general nutrition of mixed feed. During fattening with complete mixed feed, pigs of the 1st control group received 355 g of zinc sulfate containing 79.9 g of this metal, pigs of the 2nd experimental group consumed mixed feed where the same dose of sulfate was replaced entirely by zinc chelate. Its amount was 665,8 g of metal in chelate (100%), pigs of the 3rd experimental group consumed the dose of chelate reduced by 50% from the indicator of the 2nd experimental group, and it amounted to 335.9 g. Young animals of the 4th and fifth experimental groups consumed doses of chelate reduced by 75% and 87.5%, respectively, and amounted to 166.4 g and 83.2 g, respectively. The scientific experiment was carried out in the conditions of LLC "Elita" of the Kyiv region with young Large White pigs in the process of fattening. According to the principle of analogs, five groups of pigs of 18 heads in each were formed. Feeding pigs for the meat was carried out with mixed feeds of own production, which consisted of wheat grain, barley grain, corn grain, sunflower meal, and soybean meal; mineral mix Landmix, specially developed for mixed feeds, was added according to the needs of animals in the mineral substance.
The pigs had free access to feed and water to ensure optimal feed intake. The feed nutrition was the same for the animals of all the experimental groups and complied with detailed feeding standards; it was different only in Zinc content. Animals consumed feed with relish, and any changes in the behavior of the experimental pigs were overlooked. At the end of the scientific and commercial experiment, slaughtering of pigs (3 heads from each group) was carried out, followed by boning of half-carcasses to determine morphological and physicochemical parameters of slaughter products. Slaughtering criteria and meat quality were determined using general methods (Petukhova et al., 2010).
Biometric processing of the obtained results was carried out on the PC using MS Excel software and built-in statistical functions. The probability of difference between the indicators was evaluated by Student's criteria (Melnichenko et al., 2006).
Results and Discussions
In the experiment, the consumption of mixed feed by Large White pigs was controlled, which provided pigs optimal growth and development (Table 1).
Index | Group | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
control | experimental | ||||
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | |
Consumed feed for the entire period of the experiment, kg/head | 269 | 271 | 271 | 272 | 273 |
Consumed feed for the entire period of the experiment, feed unit/head | 320.1 | 322.5 | 322.5 | 323.6 | 328.8 |
Consumed feed for the main period of the experiment, kg/head | 223 | 225 | 225 | 226 | 227 |
Consumed feed for the main period of the experiment, feed unit/head | 265.4 | 265.4 | 267.8 | 268.9 | 270.1 |
Table 1. Feed consumption by experimental Large White pigs.
As shown in Table 1, pig groups with different zinc content in the feed had differences in the amount of consumed mixed feed. Thus, Large White pigs ate from 269 to 273 kg of mixed feed for the whole experiment period. The 5th experimental group pigs consumed the most significant amount of feed, by 1.5% more than in the control group. An increase in feed consumption was also observed in the second, third, and fourth experimental groups, which exceeded the control group by 0.7%, 0.7%, and 1.1%, respectively. Large White pigs consumed from 223 to 227 kg of feed during the main experimental period, which is 265.4-270.1 feed unit. Thus, the intervention of different levels of zinc chelates into the mixed feed did not cause significant changes in feed consumption of experimental pigs.
Important indicators which can measure productivity level are the dynamics of live weight and feed consumption. Having identified these two indicators, the reasonability of using one or other supplement in the diet of pigs when growing them for meat can be evaluated more accurately. Studies have shown that the live weight of older age pigs in the experimental groups depended on the level of zinc chelate consumed in the mixed feed and differed from the mass of the pigs from the control group (Table 2).
The data in table 2 indicate that different levels of zinc chelate had a positive effect on the growth of Large White pigs.
According to the research design, the livestock's live weight was defined throughout the experiment every 30 days. Pigs at 71-90 days had approximately the same live weight with variations not exceeding 1.6%. At the age of 91-120 days, the live weight of the experimental pigs varied within 1%; the difference was not significant.
However, at the age of 121-150 days, pigs from the 4th experimental group had the indicator exceeded the control by 1.9% (p≤0.05), pigs from the 5th experimental group by 2.2% (p≤0, 05). Moreover, at the age of 151-180 days, the average live weight of young pigs from the 2nd group exceeded the control by 1.4%, 3rd by 1.7 (p≤0.05), 4th by 2,4 (p≤0,01), and 5th by 3,0% (p≤0,001).
Age(days) | Group | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
control | experimental | ||||
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | |
71–90 | 30.78±0.207 | 31.26±0.302 | 31.22±0.185 | 31.00±0.282 | 31.14±0.306 |
in % with control | - | 101.6 | 101.4 | 100.7 | 101.2 |
91–120 | 51.67±0.384 | 51.91±0.521 | 52.11±0.425 | 52.18±0.428 | 52.03±0.460 |
in % with control | - | 100,5 | 100.8 | 101.0 | 100.7 |
121–150 | 77.18±0.375 | 77.87±0.818 | 78.19±0.810 | 78.66±0.887 | 78.86±0.689 |
in % with control | - | 100.9 | 101.3 | 101.9* | 102.2* |
151–180 | 102.8±1.48 | 104.3±1.74 | 104.5±2.68 | 105.3±2.20 | 105.9±3.54 |
in % with control | - | 101.4 | 101.7* | 102.4** | 103.0*** |
Table 2. Dynamics of live weight of experimental pigs, kg, X±Sx (n=18).
Pigs from the 2nd experimental group showed the slightest difference in indices of live weight compared with the control; the feed they consumed contained zinc chelate in the amount of 665.8 g/t of feed. The highest difference of live weight compared to the control was determined in the 5th experimental group, which consumed feed with zinc chelate in 83.2 g/t.
Feeding different levels of zinc chelate to experimental pigs during fattening affected feed costs per 1 kg of growth (Table 3).
The data in table 3 indicate that a slight increase in feed consumption by pigs of the experimental groups and an increase in absolute growth contributed to a decrease in feed consumption per unit of production.
Index | Group | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
control | experimental | ||||
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | |
Consumption of feed per 1 kg gain, kg | 3.29 | 3.26 | 3.25 | 3.23 | 3.22 |
Consumption of feed per 1 kg gain, feed unit | 3.91 | 3.88 | 3,87 | 3.85 | 3.84 |
Consumption of digestible protein per 1 kg gain, g | 336 | 333 | 332 | 329 | 328 |
Table 3. Feed consumption per 1 kg of pigs live weight gain.
Thus, for the whole experiment period, pigs from the 2nd experimental group consumed mixed feed less by 0.9% per1 kg of live weight gain compared with young animals of the control group. Animals from the third, fourth, and fifth experimental groups consumed less by 1.2%, 1.8, and 2.1% feed, respectively, per 1 kg of live weight gain compared to the control group. The consumption of mixed feed per 1 kg of pig lived weight gain in the 5th experimental group and was 3.84 feed units, which is less by 1.8% compared with the index of animals in the control group. Consumption of digestible protein per 1 kg of growth was the lowest in the 5th experimental group and amounted to 328 g, which is less by 2.4% compared to the control group.
Pork has a high content of easily digestible complete protein and essential amino acids, and pork fat is a source of essential fatty acids, including arachidonic acid. Therefore, the basis of proper feeding is to increase animal productivity and to raising slaughter weight to obtain products of high biological value. To study the effect of the different levels of zinc chelate on the quality of meat and lard and its chemical composition, slaughtering of animals was performed (Table 4).
Index | Group | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
control | experimental | ||||
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | |
Ante live mass, kg | 102.4±1.37 | 104.1±1.82 | 104.3±2.05 | 105.2±1.77 | 105.7±1.64 |
Slaughter mass, kg | 68.9±0.86 | 70.4±1.12 | 70.7±1.27 | 71.7±0.98* | 72.4±1.24** |
Slaughter gain, % | 67.3±0.45 | 67.6±0.64 | 67.8±1.05 | 68.2±0.85 | 68.5±0.99 |
Mass of internal fat, kg | 1.05±0.122 | 1.05±0.164 | 1.08±0.251 | 1.10±0.223 | 1.12±0.176 |
Head mass, kg | 5.10±0.314 | 5.12±0.342 | 5.17±0.236 | 5.18±0.327 | 5.21±0.338 |
Legs mass, kg | 0.84±0.055 | 0.84±0.048 | 0.85±0.075 | 0.87±0.023 | 0.88±0.062 |
Skin mass, kg | 5.85±0.277 | 5.85±0.465 | 5.87±0.306 | 5,88±0.231 | 5.92±0.262 |
The thickness of the fat above 6-7 | |||||
thoracic | 35.1±0.36 | 35.1±0,31 | 35.2±0.42 | 35.2±0.35 | 35.1±0.29 |
vertebra, mm | |||||
Rib eye area, sm2 | 29.8±0.82 | 30.2±0.74 | 30.4±0.65 | 30.5±0.58 | 30.5±0.73 |
Table 4. Indices of pigs slaughter, X±Sx (n=3).
Studies have shown that the biological role of zinc is related to the activity of the endocrine glands where it mainly concentrates. At present, it is proved that zinc is necessary for endocrine function; its involvement in the mechanism of cell fission has been proved (Huntington et al., 2002; Merzlov et al., 2009; Khalak, V. et al., 2020). An analysis of the animal control slaughter results showed that the effect of different doses of zinc chelate on the slaughter quality of pigs was positive. Pigs whose live weight was attributable as closely as possible to the average values in the group were selected for slaughter. Thus, the pre-slaughter weight of pigs from the 2nd experimental group exceeded the control by 1.7%, the 3rd by 1.8, 4th by 2.7, and 5th by 3.2%. Studies have established the high bioavailability of trace elements in cows' bodies, depending on the forms and sources of income. Different doses of Manganese, Copper, and Zinc in inorganic and organic forms as sources of trace elements for Holstein cows change the digestibility of nutrients and their absorption (Horchanok A.V. et al., 2018).
The slaughter weight of animals from the 2nd group was exceeded control analogs by 2.2%, 3rd by 2.6, 4th by 4.1 (p≤0.05), and 5th by 5.1% (p≤0.01). Animals from the control group were inferior to the analogs from the experimental groups in slaughter output. The value of this indicator in the 2nd experimental group was higher than control by 0.3%, in 3rd by 0.5, in 4th by 0.9, and in 5th by 1.2%.
The results of internal fat weighing showed that its highest weight was observed in the fourth and fifth experimental groups, which is more by 4.8% and 6.7% compared with the control. There is no significant difference between the control and experimental animals.
The larger the rib eye area means, the more valuable meat content the carcass. The analysis rib eye area of the animals from the experimental groups was 30.2-30.5 cm2; it was higher by 1.3-2.3% compared to the control analogs.
Morphological composition analysis of the carcasses showed that the meat yield in the experimental groups was high (Figure 1).
Fig 1: Morphological composition of carcasses of Large White pigs, kg.
It should be noted that the pre-slaughter live weight of pigs from the experimental groups exceeded analogs from the control group. In the half-carcasses of pigs from the experimental groups, the meat yield was more by 1.5%, 3,1, 4.6 (p≤0.05), and 6.6% (p≤ 0.01), respectively. The part of lard in the half-carcasses of animals from the 2nd experimental group exceeded the control by 2.0%, third and 4th by 5.1% (p≤0.05), and 5thgroup by 7.1% (p≤0.05). The smallest amount of bones was in the carcasses of pigs from the 4th and fifth experimental groups; this indicator was less by 10.4% (p≤0.05) than the control; in the 2nd and third groups by 2.1% and 6.2%, respectively. Thus, the enrichment of mixed feed for young Large White pigs of the experimental groups with zinc chelate contributes to the increase of slaughter indices and improves the morphological composition of the carcasses. The highest rates were found in the 5th experimental group of animals. The chemical composition of meat and lard of pigs fed with different levels of zinc chelate is shown in Table 5. An analysis of the meat chemical composition showed that its moisture content ranged from 72.4 to 73.4%. The difference was statistically insignificant. A similar pattern is established for the dry matter content. Protein, which increases the biological value of meat, was the highest in the 4th and fifth experimental groups of animals; it was higher by 0.9% compared with the control analogs. The value of this indicator in the second and third experimental groups of pigs was higher by 0.2% and 0.3%, respectively, compared to the control. The highest fat content from the longest muscle of the back was found in the first control group of animals and was 4.84%. This indicator was slightly lower in the second, third, fourth, and fifth experimental groups of pigs; it was lower by 0.54%, 1.06, 1.89 (p≤0.05), and 2.01% (p≤0.05), respectively.
Index | Group | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
control | experimental | ||||
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | |
Meat | |||||
Moisture, % | 72.4±0.44 | 72.7±0.28 | 73.1±0.34 | 73.3±0.48 | 73.4±0.25 |
Dry matter, % | 27.6±0.40 | 27.3±0.51 | 26.9±0.37 | 26.7±0.58 | 26.6±0.42 |
including protein, % | 20.8±0.36 | 21.0±0.41 | 21.1±0.64 | 21.7±0.30 | 21.7±0.32 |
fat, % | 4.84±0.152 | 4.30±0.12 | 3.78±0.08 | 2.95±0.17* | 2.83±0.12* |
ash, % | 1.96±0.018 | 2.00±0.11 | 2.02±0.04 | 2.05±0.14* | 2.07±0.08* |
Lard | |||||
Moisture, % | 5.86±0.235 | 5.86±0.422 | 5.81±0.291 | 5.75±0.384 | 5.75±0.417 |
Protein, % | 1.54±0.122 | 1.59±0.173 | 1.67±0.154 | 1.88±0.094 | 1.93±0.091* |
Fat, % | 92.6±0.49 | 92.6±0.68 | 92.5±0.67 | 92.4±0.55 | 92.3±0.91 |
Table 5. Chemical composition of pigs meat and lard, X±Sx (n=3)
A significant difference was seen in the ash content in the meat of the control and experimental groups, which can be explained by better absorption of zinc chelate. The highest ash content was determined in the 5th group of animals; it was 2.07% (p≤0.05). In the second, third and fourth groups of animals, this index exceeded the control by 0.04%, and 0.06, and 0.09%. Lard of the animals from the control and experimental groups differed insignificantly in chemical composition from the control. Protein content was highest in the lard of animals from the 5th experimental group and amounted to 1.93%, which is more by 0.39% (p≤0.05) than analogs from the 1st control group. There is no significant difference between the mass of the internal organ of pigs in the groups (Table 6). The results of the studies indicate a positive effect of the addition of organic-mineral origin of the mixed-ligand complex of Copper on the growth and development of young pigs on fattening. The animals had the highest live weight, which fed the Copper bathrobe in the amount of 21.2 and 15.4 g/t of compound feed, which covered the Copper deficit in the diet by 55 % and 40 %. Animals at the age of 150 days had a live weight of 2.3 % and 1.9 % more, respectively, compared to the same indicator in the control group (Podkhaliuzina O.M. et al., 2020).
Our research is consistent with the research of other scientists, so we can say that zinc chelate has a positive effect on the productive qualities of pigs for fattening.
Index | Group | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
control | experimental | ||||
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | |
Liver, kg | 1.97±0.140 | 1.97±0.121 | 1.95±0.315 | 1.95±0.285 | 1.93±0.347 |
Heart, kg | 0.25±0.042 | 0.25±0.053 | 0.23±0.142 | 0.23±0.047 | 0.22±0.119 |
Lungs, kg | 0.34±0.05 | 0.34±0.05 | 0.34±0.05 | 0.34±0.05 | 0.34±0.05 |
Kidneys, kg | 0.23±0.005 | 0.24±0.007 | 0.24±0.011 | 0.23±0.032 | 0.23±0.026 |
Spleen, kg | 0.13±0.01 | 0.12±0.02 | 0.12±0.01 | 0.11±0.03 | 0,11±0,02 |
Stomach, kg | 0.75±0.12 | 0.78±0.08 | 0.80±0.05 | 0.83±0.11 | 0.85±0.07 |
Small intestine: mass, kg | 1.08±0.02 | 1.14±0.03 | 1.18±0.05 | 1.20±0.04 | 1.22±0.03 |
length, m | 12.0±0.28 | 11.3±0.15 | 11.3±0.32 | 11.6±0.22 | 11.8±0.25 |
Large intestine: mass, kg | 1.80±0.22 | 1.85±0.24 | 1.90±0.20 | 1.98±0.27 | 2.05±0.31 |
length, m | 2.28±0.54 | 2.28±0.34 | 2.32±0.48 | 2.32±0.52 | 2.40±0.41 |
Table 6. Characteristic of pigs internal organs mass, X±Sx (n=3).
The experiment results in establishing optimal doses of zinc chelate indicate that this nutritional feed supplement provides animal productivity and has a specific effect on the mass of internal organs. However, there were no deviations from the norm in the experimental groups of pigs than in control. Considering that the liver performs metabolic, antibacterial, antitoxic, regenerative, and other functions, changes in the mass of this organ in the control and experimental groups of pigs ranged at 2.0%. There is an insignificant difference between the animals from the control and experimental groups. Analysis of heart, lungs, kidneys, and spleen mass indicates no significant differences between the control and experimental groups. The mass of internal organs in the experimental groups of pigs was at the level of control, and the differences between animals of different groups during biometric processing were statistically insignificant (p≥0.05).
Regarding the mass of digestive organs, it should be noted that pigs consumed different levels of zinc chelate had a larger mass of stomach, small and large intestine. The highest index of the mass compared with the control was in the 5th experimental group of pigs which consumed mixed feed containing zinc chelate in 83.2 g/t. Thus, animals from the 2nd-4th experimental groups by mass of the stomach exceeded the control by 4.0-10.7%. In the 5th group of pigs, this indicator was higher by 13.3%. It was compared with the control. By the mass of small intestine animals from the 2nd experimental group exceeded control analogs by 5.6%, and animals from the third, fourth, and fifth groups by 9.3%, 11.1, and 12.9%, respectively; the most significant length of small intestine was11.8 m found in the 5th experimental group of pigs. By the mass of the large intestine, animals from the second experimental group exceeded control analogs by 2.8%, from third by 5.6%, from fourth by 10.0%, and from fifth – by 13.9%. The most considerable length of the large intestine was 2.4 m found in the 5th experimental group of pigs.
Conclusion
During the experimental period, the experimental animals showed a high intensity of growth seen from the dynamics of live weight in each month of fattening. The balance of diets can explain this with the essential nutrients and zinc chelate on the basic life processes: hematopoiesis, growth and development of the body, metabolism of proteins, fats, and carbohydrates, energy metabolism, and maintenance of the organism natural resistance. The best indicators of the growing intensity and conversion of feed were established in the 5th experimental group of pigs, where the zinc chelate in the amount of 83.2 g/t was added into mixed feeds. Feeding zinc in the form of an organic chelate in the mixed feed for young Large White pigs in the process of fattening increases slaughter indices, meat yield, and its chemical composition. It should be noted that the indexes of Large White pigs consumed doses of zinc chelate in the amount of 83.2 g/t in the mixed feed exceeded significantly control.
References
Bomko, V.S., Smetanіna, O.V., Kuzmenko, O.A. (2015). Influence of premix on based metalohelatov on digestibility of nutrients highly productive cows. Scientific Messenger of LNU of Veterinary Medicine and Biotechnologies, 17, 1 (61), 3, 17–22 (in Ukrainian).
Borisevich, V., Borisevich, B., Petrenko, O. (2008). Vpliv nanoakvahelatіv metalіv na pіdsosnih porosjat. Tvarinnictvo Ukrajiny, 12, 33–34 (in Ukrainian).
Dyachenko, L.S., Syvyc, T.L., Tytariova, O.M., Kuzmenko, O.A., Bilkevich, V.V. (2017). Natural detoxicants in pig rations and their impact on productivity and quality of slaughter products. Ukrainian Journal of Ecology, 7(2), 239–246, doi: 10.15421/2017_42
El Ashry, G.M., Hassan, A. M. and Soliman, S. M. (2012). Effect of feeding a combination of Zinc, Manganese and Copper Methionine chelates of early lactation high producing dairy cow. Food and Nutri. Sci., 3: 1084-1091.
Hackbart, K.S., Ferreira, R.M., Dietsche, A.A., Socha, M.T Shaver, R. D., Wiltbank, M. C. and Fricke, P.M. (2010). Effect of dietary organic zinc, manganese, copper, and cobalt supplementation on milk production, follicular growth, embryo quality, and tissue mineral concentrations in dairy cows. J. Anim. Sci.,88(12):3856-3870.
Horchanok, A., Kuzmenko, O. (2018). Bioavailability of microelements from different compounds in the body of cows and their effect on digestibility. Collection of scientific works international. Proceed. Int. Sc. Conf. Kiyv.
Horchanok, A. V., Kuzmenko, O.A., Khalak, V.I., Porotikova, I.I, Lunska, A.Yu. (2019). Efficiency of using of the organic mineral mixed ligand cuprum in the pig feeding. Annals of the Faculty of Engineering Hunedoara; Hunedoara, 17, 3, 145–148.
Huntington, C.E., Bollinger, D.W., Veum, T.L. and Brommelsiek, W.A. (2002). Effect of lower dietary concentrations of zinc oxide on growth performance and zinc excretion by weanling pigs. J. Anim. Sci., 80, 162.
Khalak, V., Horchanok, A., Kuzmenko, O., Lytvyshchenko, L., Lieshchova, M., Кalinichenko, A., Liskovich, V., Zagoruy, L. (2020). Protein metabolism, physicochemical properties and chemical composition of muscle tissue in Large White weaners. Ukrainian Journal of Ecology, 10(4), 127-131, doi: 10.15421/2020_179.
Mavromichalis, I., Webel, D., Parr, E. (2001). Growth-promoting efficacy of pharmacological doses of tetrabasic zinc chloride in diets for nursery pigs. Anim. Sci, 81, 367–391.
Mel’nychenko, O.P., Yakymenko, I.L., Shevchenko, R.L. (2006). Statystychna obrobka eksperymental'nykh danykh. Bila Tserkva (in Ukrainian). Merzlov, S.V. (2009). Konstrujuvannja mіneral'no-organіchnih spoluk kobal'tu ta kontrol' procesu helatoutvorennja. Naukovij vіsnik L'vіv. nac. un-tu.
vet. medicini ta bіoteh. іm. S.Z. Gzhitskogo, 2 (41), 172–175 (in Ukrainian).
Nagalakshmi, D., Sridhar, K., Satyanarayana, M., Parashu Ramulu, S., Narwade, V.S. and Vikram, L. (2018) Effect of replacing inorganic zinc with a lower level of organic zinc (Zn propionate) on performance of biochemical constituents, antioxidant, immune and mineral status in buffaloe calves. Indian J. Anim. Res, 52(9), 1292-1297.
Pal, D.T., Gowda, N.K. S., Prasad, C.S., Amarnath, R., Bharadwal, U., Suresh Babu, G. and Sampath, K.T. (2010). Effect of copperand zinc- methionine supplementation on bioavailability, rrtineral status and tissue concentrations of copper and zinc in ewes. J. Trace Elem. Med. Bio., 24, 89-94.
Petukhova, E.A., Bessarabova, R.F., Khaleneva, L.D., Antonova, O.A. (2010). Zootekhnycheskyy analyz kormov. Saint Petersburg (in Russian) Podkhaliuzina, O.M., Bomko, V.S., Kuzmenko, O.A. (2020). Peretravnist kormu ta produktyvnist molodniaku svynei na vidhodivli za vykorystannia
zmishanolihandnoho kompleksu Kuprumu. Zbirnyk naukovykh prats “Tekhnolohiia vyrobnytstva i pererobky produktsii tvarynnytstva”, 1, 118– 124, doi: 10.33245/2310-9270-2020-157-1-118-124.
Saripinar Aksu, D., Aksu, T. Ozsoy B. and Baytok. E. (2010). The effects of replacing inorganic with at lower level of organically complexed minerals (Cu, Zn and Mn) in broiler diets on lipid peroxidation and antioxidant defense systems. Asia.-Austr. J. Anim.Sci, 23, 1066-1072.
Sethy, K., Behera, K., Mishra, S. K., Gupta, S.K., Sahoo, N., Parhi, S.S., Mahapatra, M. R. and Khadanga. S. (2018). Effect of organic zinc supplementation on growth, metabolic profile and antioxidant status of Ganjam Sheep. Indian J. Anim. Res. 52(6), 839-842.
Smetanina, O.V., Ibatulin, I.I., Bomko, V.S., Bomko, L.G., Kuzmenko, O.A. (2017). Influence of mixed ligand complex of сobalt on its metabolism in the organism of highly productive cows. Ukrainian Journal of Ecology, 7(4), 559–563, doi: 10.15421/2017_160.
Wang, R. L., Liang, J. G., Lu, L., Zhang, L. Y. and Li, S. F. (2013). Effect of zinc source on performance, zinc status, immune response, and rumen fermentation of lactating cows. Biol. Trace Elem.Res.,152(1), 16-24.
Author Info
O. Kuzmenko1*, V. Bomko1, А. Horchanok2, O. Cherniavskyi1, V. Malina1, L. Lytvyshchenko2, R. Umanets3, L. Zlamaniuk3, D. Umanets3 and I. Porotikova22Dnipro State Agrarian and Economic University, Dnipro, Ukraine
3National University of Life and Environmental Sciences of Ukraine, Ukraine
Citation: Kuzmenko, O., Bomko, V., Horchanok, А., Cherniavskyi, O., Malina, V., Lytvyshchenko, L., Umanets, R., Zlamaniuk, L., Umanets, D., Porotikova, I. (2021). Influence of chelates on pigs productivity and quality. Ukrainian Journal of Ecology, 11 (2), 268-273.
Received: 11-Mar-2021 Accepted: 15-Apr-2021 Published: 30-Apr-2021, DOI: 10.15421/2021_110
Copyright: This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.